Introduction:
The general practice in evaluating the impact of Marketing investment is
to analyze monthly or weekly sales of key brands vs. drivers like price,
marketing and competition using a regression analysis technique called
Marketing Mix Analysis. While this captures how Marketing impacts sales at
the Brand level, it doesn't tell you if the marketing drove incremental
sales or not. Incrementality analysis can only be done when looking at the
impact of Marketing on aggregate category or industry demand.
Marketing is truly incremental if it helps drive not only brand sales but
also category or industry sales, because brand growth can also come due to
switching, while category or industry growth can only come from
incremental consumption. Also a truly long-term analysis cannot be
conducted with just a couple of years of data.
While we do not have access to data for Marketing Investment at the
category or industry level, we did obtain total annual Marketing
investment data and total Retail Sales for the U.S. since 1968 (Retail
Sales were obtained from U.S. Census Bureau, while Marketing data was
obtained from multiple sources on the internet).
Methodology:
The
approach we used was a simple log-linear regression model where annual
changes in Retail Sales were modeled against changes in the log of
Television Advertising, Print Advertising, Inflation Rate and change in
Personal Income. Other Marketing data tested included Radio Advertising
and an aggregate of Outdoor and Internet Advertising, which did not turn
up as significant in this long-term “Incrementality” model. This of course
doesn’t mean that other drivers don’t impact retail sales, all it says is
that other Marketing drivers do not impact total Retail sales growth. They
could still category, industry or brand level growth.
Results:
Below chart shows the incremental “elasticity” of each of these drivers on
total Retail Sales.

Interestingly after
Personal Income, Print Advertising is the next largest driver of Retail
Sales, slightly ahead of the impact of Inflation. This doesn’t say that TV
Advertising is a less impactful driver of consumer response; all it is
saying is that on average Print Advertising may be doing a better job at
either increasing overall consumption than TV. In general the accepted
norm in the marketing industry is that TV Advertising is generally the
largest driver of brand level sales. This opens up the implication that TV
advertising works better at getting consumers to switch, whereas Print
Advertising works better at driving incremental growth.
Retail Sales Sources of
Incremental Growth in 2006

For instance, the above
chart shows that overall Retail sales grew by 5.3% in 2006 vs. 2005 and
shows what factors contributed to this change (both negative and positive
impacts).
|
|
Personal
Income |
TV
Advertising |
Other Factors |
Inflation |
Print
Advertising |
|
Year Over
Year Change |
7.1% |
5.8% |
5.0% |
3.2% |
-0.8% |
Compare this to how these
underlying drivers changed in 2006 vs. 2005 and you will notice that a
5.8% growth in TV Advertising drove only a 0.5% growth in overall Retail
Sales, while Print a -0.8% change in Advertising investment resulted in a
0.2% decline in Retail Sales. This underscores the possibility that Print
may be a better medium for long-term incremental growth.
The reason why Marketers
should be concerned about incremental growth is that it is usually more
profitable and has better retention than growth driven purely by share
gains- especially for categories that are growing.